The Clink Home
The Clink Home

The Problem With Steak

The problem with steak is that you sometimes feel you need to “atone” with something “less heavy” the next day. Which is how one of us started leafing through Madhur Jaffrey’s At Home with Madhur Jaffrey. Honestly, everything I’ve made from that book has been great, it’s just that it’s hard to gear up for vegetables. Part of what makes At Home so good is that most, if not all, of the recipes are super simple and not very time consuming. Jen alighted on Potato and Pea Curry (page 168). Which was good. She compromised by suggesting a kofta of some sort. I flipped to the Baked Pate-Kebabs recipe (page 23) and got distracted by “pate.” So instead of a loaf of ground turkey sliced thin we had ground lamb mixed in with a bastardized version of chicken liver pate (using livers from the baggies in some whole chickens we had) along with the fragrant flavors of the Indian spices the original recipe details. This was good, though liver becomes really sticky for some reason, at least until you add the egg.

Chicken Liver Sort-Of Pate Bowdlerized From Joy Of Cooking (Page 725)
Not 8 tablespoons of butter but rather one or two;
No shallots (didn’t have any);
No apples (I’m sure it’s a good touch but no);
Two chicken livers (not a pound);
Hoochy brandy, instead of Calvados or Cognac;
Either ricotta cheese or yogurt instead of heavy cream;
Immersion blender suffices.

Posted: February 15th, 2015 | Author: Scott | Filed under: Home Cooking | Tags: Chicken Liver Sort-Of Pate, Madhur Jaffrey

Steak, Cont.

Jen tried Alton Brown’s Pan-Seared Rib-Eye method of cooking steaks last night; it worked. It involved flipping the steak more than once then putting it in the oven. Goober passed along this Serious Eats piece in f(l)avor of flipping more than once just the other day. Having not yet gotten a good char after using the sous vide immersion machine, I’m wondering about the utility of steaks in a sous vide; I’ve used an Iwatani and then also a Searzall but it’s possible I’m not doing it right.

More to come, obviously.

Posted: February 15th, 2015 | Author: Scott | Filed under: Home Cooking | Tags: Char, Sous Vide Vs. Analog, Steaks

Aecht Schlenkerla Eiche Doppelbock

Today’s happy hour: Aecht Schlenkerla Eiche Doppelbock

Aecht Schlenkerla Eiche Doppelbock, March 28, 2012

Jen thinks: “Fall, earthy, burning leaves, firewood, summer camp. Distinctly smoky smell. Long smoky finish.”

Which is all a fancy way of saying what the guy at the beer store said: “It tastes like fuckin’ bacon.”

It’s fair to think of it as a bacon beer — a lot has to do with smell but also the feel on the palate. But it’s not as intensely smoky as other bacon beers — as smoky as you want it to be.

Jen notes the beer’s medium amber color. Jen also notes that there’s almost no head. Neither of us knows whether this matters.

Jen thinks this could be a session beer (actually, at 8 percent alcohol it wouldn’t fit that definition, but you could also add that this certainly doesn’t taste like it has 8% alcohol). Jen thinks that she could drink this beer with eggs — recommended if you like the taste of smoke in your alcohol — like a peaty scotch.

Posted: April 2nd, 2012 | Author: Scott | Filed under: Beer!, Happy Hour | Tags: Smoke Beer

When Government Protects Businesses, Businesses Become Corrupt

The people fighting sensible liquor reform laws in New Jersey are the ones with the most to lose:

[T]he reforms in New Jersey have been met with protests from liquor retailers and wholesalers, who worry that new ways to buy alcohol threatens their livelihood.

. . .

The booze battles have caused an uptick in political spending from the industry. Lobbyists representing the beer and wine industry spent $640,500 in New Jersey last year, up by 15% from the $556,900 spent in 2010, according to an analysis of state Election Law Enforcement Commission records. The industry also made $500,325 in contributions to individual lawmakers and state political committees last year, the records show.

The largest chunk of the lobbying money was spent by associations representing liquor retailers and wholesalers.

Posted: March 23rd, 2012 | Author: Scott | Filed under: News And Notes

Wine In Supermarkets

If you’ve ever traveled to a state that doesn’t have some goofy post-Prohibition-era restriction on selling hooch in grocery stores, you know what a thrill it can be. People in New York are trying to allow supermarkets to sell wine, a cause that doesn’t get the attention it deserves in the zero-sum world of commercial entities arguing over who stands to make or lose money. In short, New York wine makers want to sell more of their product while mom-and-pop liquor stores want to restrict other businesses.

The idea that it’s more convenient and probably cheaper for a consumer to be able to go into a supermarket and buy wine doesn’t seem to come up. Or at least “consumers” don’t in and of themselves constitute a constituency that anyone wants to lobby for. Sure, we feel “bad” for the mom-and-pop liquor stores, but the role of government isn’t or shouldn’t be to prop up certain storeowners.

The frustrating thing is that most of the reporting about this issue tends to be skewed toward the urban liquor store owners, where there’s a built-in Shop Around The Corner good guy/bad guy narrative. You don’t get the other side of the story, where people who live in rural areas might actually benefit from having more than one place to buy hooch within however many miles.

But even if you focus on the urban storeowners’ arguments, there’s a logical inconsistency:

[The owner of a] wine shop [who] has run wine stores in Little Italy for more than 24 years, says letting supermarkets get into the wine business would push out small stores.

“They’ve already taken away the fishmongers, the butchers and the bakers — and now they want the wine people as well,” [he] said of supermarkets. “I don’t understand why they need more profit.”

He said he goes out of his way to stock New York area wines and that if given the chance, supermarkets wouldn’t. “I carry 30 wines from New York,” [he] said. “Supermarkets will sell the most generic crap they can make money off of. It will be a very pedestrian wine selection.”

Again, no one’s talking about the consumer — if supermarkets sell cheap “pedestrian” wine, doesn’t that open up the mom-and-pop stores to expand their selection? If supermarkets stock the big sellers, suddenly the mom-and-pop shelf space won’t have to be taken up with generic or otherwise pedestrian crap. I never understood this part in particular. And if you want to even playing fields, take the extra step and allow liquor stores to sell food — that way they could really cater to a high-ticket clientele . . .

Posted: March 19th, 2012 | Author: Scott | Filed under: News And Notes
When Government Protects Businesses, Businesses Become Corrupt »
« Man, Oh, Manischewitz!
« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Pages

  • About The Clink

Recent Posts

  • Madeira
  • Cassis
  • Aquavit
  • Asian Ingredients
  • Blended Scotch For More Than Scotch & Soda

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

  • The Clink RSS Feed

Links

  • Blue Cleaver Wine Pages
  • Bridge and Tunnel Club Blue Cleaver Main Page
  • Bridge and Tunnel Club Main Page

Contact

  • Back To Bridge and Tunnel Club Home
    info -at- bridgeandtunnelclub.com

BATC Main Page

  • Bridge and Tunnel Club

2025 | The Clink